Diggs v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Diggs v. State

963 S.W.2d 78, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 28, 1998 WL 89148

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 4, 1998

DocketNo. 1441-96

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 963 S.W.2d 78 (Diggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diggs v. State, 963 S.W.2d 78, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 28, 1998 WL 89148 (Tex. 1998).

Pincite

Opinions

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted appellant of forgery, sentenced her to seventeen years’ confinement, and fined her $2,000. The Houston Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence. Diggs v. State, 928 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1996). We granted discretionary review on two grounds. We decide our decision to grant discretionary review was improvident. Therefore, we dismiss appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted appellant of forgery, sentenced her to seventeen years’ confinement, and fined her $2,000. The Houston Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence. Diggs v. State, 928 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1996). We granted discretionary review on two grounds. We decide our decision to grant discretionary review was improvident. Therefore, we dismiss appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

963 S.W.2d 78, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 28, 1998 WL 89148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diggs-v-state-texcrimapp-1998.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack