Diggs v. State
963 S.W.2d 78, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 28, 1998 WL 89148
Opinions
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
A jury convicted appellant of forgery, sentenced her to seventeen years’ confinement, and fined her $2,000. The Houston Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence. Diggs v. State, 928 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1996). We granted discretionary review on two grounds. We decide our decision to grant discretionary review was improvident. Therefore, we dismiss appellant’s petition for discretionary review.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Diggs v. State, 963 S.W.2d 78, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 28, 1998 WL 89148 (Tex. 1998).
963 S.W.2d 78 (Diggs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Runnels, Carl Lee v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005