Diggs v. State
This text of 334 So. 2d 333 (Diggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Diggs was tried in the circuit court on an information charging him with unlawfully departing the scene of an accident involving a personal injury.1 At trial the state recognized that the statute number set forth in the information, to wit, § 316.061, was incorrect and moved to amend the statute number to § 316.027, which motion was granted by the court. The state failed to amend the body of the information to include the word “willfully” so as to make the offense a felony under § 316.027(2).2
The jury returned a guilty verdict and the court, assuming that Diggs had been convicted of a felony under § 316.027(2), sentenced him to six months to five years. Subsequently Diggs filed a motion to vacate and after a hearing the court vacated the original sentence and re-sentenced Diggs to one year in the county jail.
A person not charged with willfully failing to stop under these circumstances can only be convicted of a misdemeanor. State ex rel. Miller v. Patterson, Fla.App. 2nd, 1973, 284 So.2d 9.
Accordingly, the judgment and sentence on the felony charge are vacated and the cause is remanded with instructions to enter a judgment of conviction on the misdemean- or charge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
334 So. 2d 333, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diggs-v-state-fladistctapp-1976.