Diggs v. State

334 So. 2d 333, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15722
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 30, 1976·No. No. 75-149·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Diggs was tried in the circuit court on an information charging him with unlawfully departing the scene of an accident involving a personal injury.1 At trial the state recognized that the statute number set forth in the information, to wit, § 316.061, was incorrect and moved to amend the statute number to § 316.027, which motion was granted by the court. The state failed to amend the body of the information to include the word “willfully” so as to make the offense a felony under § 316.027(2).2

The jury returned a guilty verdict and the court, assuming that Diggs had been convicted of a felony under § 316.027(2), sentenced him to six months to five years. Subsequently Diggs filed a motion to vacate and after a hearing the court vacated the original sentence and re-sentenced Diggs to one year in the county jail.

A person not charged with willfully failing to stop under these circumstances can only be convicted of a misdemeanor. State ex rel. Miller v. Patterson, Fla.App. 2nd, 1973, 284 So.2d 9.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence on the felony charge are vacated and the cause is remanded with instructions to enter a judgment of conviction on the misdemean- or charge.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diggs v. State, 334 So. 2d 333, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15722 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

334 So. 2d 333 (Diggs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stanfill v. State
384 So. 2d 141 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Stanfill v. State
360 So. 2d 128 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)