Diggs v. State
This text of 101 So. 357 (Diggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The indictment was in Code form and charged a burglary of a dwelling, or shop, store, warehouse, or other building of E. H. Baker, in which goods, merchandise, or clothing, things of value, were kept for sale, use, or deposit. The evidence for the state was that defendant broke and entered a storehouse of B. H. Baker, but there was no evidence that “things of value, were kept for sale, use, or deposit.” The .judgment in this case is reversed, on authority of Gilmore v. State, 99 Ala. 154, 13 South. 536; Porter v. State, 17 Ala. App. 550, 86 South. 143; Ashmon v. State, 9 Ala. App. 29, 63 South. 754.
Tlie judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 So. 357, 20 Ala. App. 213, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diggs-v-state-alactapp-1924.