Digeronimo v. Reasbeck

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Digeronimo v. Reasbeck

528 So. 2d 556, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1758, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3345, 1988 WL 76022

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 27, 1988

DocketNo. 88-1754

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 528 So. 2d 556 (Digeronimo v. Reasbeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Digeronimo v. Reasbeck, 528 So. 2d 556, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1758, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3345, 1988 WL 76022 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to prohibit respondent from presiding in further proceedings in the case of Genevieve Scala, Plaintiff v. Timothy Alexander, M.D., et. al., Case No. 86-28745 CP, in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County, Florida. Although it appears that the facts as alleged in petitioner’s verified motion for recusal and disqualification did not present legally sufficient grounds for disqualification, respondent’s comments during the hearing on petitioner’s motion show that he went beyond a determination of the legal sufficiency of the motion. Therefore, we grant petitioner’s petition for writ of prohibition on the authority of Bundy v. Rudd, 366 So.2d 440 (Fla.1978), Gieseke v. Moriarty, 471 So.2d 80 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), and the most recent decisions in Ryon v. Reasbeck, 525 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), and Fruehe v. Reasbeck, 525 So.2d 471 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

PROHIBITION GRANTED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to prohibit respondent from presiding in further proceedings in the case of Genevieve Scala, Plaintiff v. Timothy Alexander, M.D., et. al., Case No. 86-28745 CP, in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County, Florida. Although it appears that the facts as alleged in petitioner’s verified motion for recusal and disqualification did not present legally sufficient grounds for disqualification, respondent’s comments during the hearing on petitioner’s motion show that he went beyond a determination of the legal sufficiency of the motion. Therefore, we grant petitioner’s petition for writ of prohibition on the authority of Bundy v. Rudd, 366 So.2d 440 (Fla.1978), Gieseke v. Moriarty, 471 So.2d 80 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), and the most recent decisions in Ryon v. Reasbeck, 525 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), and Fruehe v. Reasbeck, 525 So.2d 471 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

PROHIBITION GRANTED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

528 So. 2d 556, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1758, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3345, 1988 WL 76022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/digeronimo-v-reasbeck-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack