Digangi v. State
This text of 488 So. 2d 626 (Digangi v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of aggravated battery and grand theft. He contends the trial court erred in imposing fines, restitution, and a public defender’s fee when he was indigent. The State concedes that the case must be remanded for a determination of appellant’s ability to pay. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Furthermore, the trial court should also correct the conflict between the oral pronouncement at sentencing and the trial court’s written order regarding the fine in Count II.
REMANDED FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT HEREWITH.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 So. 2d 626, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1125, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/digangi-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.