Difuria v. Wallace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Difuria v. Wallace

166 A.D. 967, 151 N.Y.S. 1112

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 166 A.D. 967 (Difuria v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Difuria v. Wallace, 166 A.D. 967, 151 N.Y.S. 1112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to [968]*968abide event. Held, that the evidence presented a question of fact as to the refusal of the defendant to perform, thereby relieving the plaintiff from the tender of the purchase price, and that the credibility of the plaintiff’s testimony, under the circumstances of this case, was for the jury. (See Mendoza v. Levy, 111 App. Div. 449, and cases cited.) All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to [968]*968abide event. Held, that the evidence presented a question of fact as to the refusal of the defendant to perform, thereby relieving the plaintiff from the tender of the purchase price, and that the credibility of the plaintiff’s testimony, under the circumstances of this case, was for the jury. (See Mendoza v. Levy, 111 App. Div. 449, and cases cited.) All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 A.D. 967, 151 N.Y.S. 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/difuria-v-wallace-nyappdiv-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack