DiFilippo v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

DiFilippo v. McCall

196 A.D.2d 610, 601 N.Y.S.2d 861

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 18, 1993·Published

Opinion

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the applications are granted, and the Board of Elections of the City of New York is directed to afford the voters of the Republican Party the opportunity to ballot at the Republican Party primary election, to be held on September 14, 1993, for the public office of Kings County District Attorney (see, Matter of McCall v Hynes, 196 AD2d 618 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the applications are granted, and the Board of Elections of the City of New York is directed to afford the voters of the Republican Party the opportunity to ballot at the Republican Party primary election, to be held on September 14, 1993, for the public office of Kings County District Attorney (see, Matter of McCall v Hynes, 196 AD2d 618 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

DiFilippo v. McCall, 196 A.D.2d 610, 601 N.Y.S.2d 861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

196 A.D.2d 610 (DiFilippo v. McCall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related