Difilippo ex rel. Difilippo v. Rayle

669 So. 2d 306, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2039, 1996 WL 93908
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 6, 1996
DocketNo. 95-1492
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 669 So. 2d 306 (Difilippo ex rel. Difilippo v. Rayle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Difilippo ex rel. Difilippo v. Rayle, 669 So. 2d 306, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2039, 1996 WL 93908 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record reflects that the matters raised in the instant lawsuit relate to two other cases that were settled and closed more than one year before the instant action was commenced. In view of the fact that the matters raised by appellants in the instant lawsuit are intrinsic, rather than extrinsic, the trial court was correct in entering its order of dismissal. See Cerniglia v. Cerniglia, 655 So.2d 172 (Fla. 3d DCA), review granted, 662 So.2d 931 (Fla.1995); Langer v. hanger, 463 So.2d 429 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Difilippo v. Rayle
684 So. 2d 819 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
669 So. 2d 306, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2039, 1996 WL 93908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/difilippo-ex-rel-difilippo-v-rayle-fladistctapp-1996.