Diffene v. Oppert
This text of 242 A.D. 664 (Diffene v. Oppert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, motion denied, verdict reinstated and judgment directed to be entered thereon, with -costs. There was in this ease a fair question of fact which was resolved by the jury in favor of defendant, and no good reason why the verdict [665]*665should be disturbed has been shown. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diffene-v-oppert-nyappdiv-1934.