Difalco v. Subaru of America, Inc.
617 A.2d 1213, 130 N.J. 585, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1286
Opinion
ORDER
The parties in interest having settled and stipulated to a dismissal of defendant Takata Corporation’s appeal before this Court;
And the Attorney General having determined that in light of the settlement and this Court’s decision in Crespo v. Stapf, 128 N.J. 351, 608 A.2d 241 (1992), he does not seek further review of the judgment of the Appellate Division;
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that the appeal of the Attorney General is dismissed as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Difalco v. Subaru of America, Inc., 617 A.2d 1213, 130 N.J. 585, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1286 (N.J. 1992).
617 A.2d 1213 (Difalco v. Subaru of America, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crespo v. Stapf
608 A.2d 241 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1992)