Difalco v. Subaru of America, Inc.
This text of 617 A.2d 1213 (Difalco v. Subaru of America, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The parties in interest having settled and stipulated to a dismissal of defendant Takata Corporation’s appeal before this Court;
And the Attorney General having determined that in light of the settlement and this Court’s decision in Crespo v. Stapf, 128 N.J. 351, 608 A.2d 241 (1992), he does not seek further review of the judgment of the Appellate Division;
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that the appeal of the Attorney General is dismissed as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
617 A.2d 1213, 130 N.J. 585, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/difalco-v-subaru-of-america-inc-nj-1992.