Dievlese Williams v. State
This text of Dievlese Williams v. State (Dievlese Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
DIEVLESE WILLIAMS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-1225
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed July 13, 2018
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Dan Traver, Judge.
Dievlese Williams, Chipley, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Dievlese Williams appeals the summary denial of both grounds raised in his motion
for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We
affirm as to Ground Two. However, we reverse the summary denial of Ground One and
remand for attachment of portions of the record refuting that claim or for an evidentiary
hearing. See Freeman v. State, 761 So. 2d 1055, 1061 (Fla. 2000) (“[A] defendant is
entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a postconviction relief motion unless (1) the motion, files, and records in the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief,
or (2) the motion or a particular claim is legally insufficient.”).
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
SAWAYA, ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dievlese Williams v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dievlese-williams-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.