Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Dieutamy Exilus Acquissa v. Johnson

Dieutamy Exilus Acquissa v. Johnson

958 So. 2d 513, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8266, 2007 WL 1542419
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 30, 2007
DocketNo. 3D06-2924
StatusPublished

This text of 958 So. 2d 513 (Dieutamy Exilus Acquissa v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dieutamy Exilus Acquissa v. Johnson, 958 So. 2d 513, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8266, 2007 WL 1542419 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Broadfoot v. Broadfoot, 791 So.2d 584, 585 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(affirming where there was no indication that the need for statutory findings was called to the attention of the trial court); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (stating that without a transcript, the record is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Broadfoot v. Broadfoot
791 So. 2d 584 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
958 So. 2d 513, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8266, 2007 WL 1542419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dieutamy-exilus-acquissa-v-johnson-fladistctapp-2007.