Dietz v. Weisthal

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Dietz v. Weisthal

131 Misc. 597, 227 N.Y.S. 568, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 753

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1928

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 Misc. 597 (Dietz v. Weisthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dietz v. Weisthal, 131 Misc. 597, 227 N.Y.S. 568, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s counsel having been actually engaged in the trial of a case in the Supreme Court and having presented an affidavit to the court, defendant was entitled to an adjournment.

The order opening the default is modified by striking out the terms imposed, and as so modified is affirmed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Crain, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s counsel having been actually engaged in the trial of a case in the Supreme Court and having presented an affidavit to the court, defendant was entitled to an adjournment.

The order opening the default is modified by striking out the terms imposed, and as so modified is affirmed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Crain, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 Misc. 597, 227 N.Y.S. 568, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dietz-v-weisthal-nyappterm-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack