Dietz v. Weisthal
131 Misc. 597, 227 N.Y.S. 568, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 753
Opinion
Defendant’s counsel having been actually engaged in the trial of a case in the Supreme Court and having presented an affidavit to the court, defendant was entitled to an adjournment.
The order opening the default is modified by striking out the terms imposed, and as so modified is affirmed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Crain, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dietz v. Weisthal, 131 Misc. 597, 227 N.Y.S. 568, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
131 Misc. 597 (Dietz v. Weisthal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Poole v. Mayer
112 A.D.2d 853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)