Dietz v. Dietz

New York Supreme Court

Dietz v. Dietz

136 N.Y.S. 341

DecidedJune 14, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 136 N.Y.S. 341 (Dietz v. Dietz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dietz v. Dietz, 136 N.Y.S. 341 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

GIEGERICH, J.

It appears from the papers submitted that the justice before whom this action for a separation was tried! announced orally at the conclusion of the trial that he had decided the issues in favor of the defendant. It is undisputed, however, that no formal decision or judgment has as yet been entered.

[1] As temporary alimony continues until the entry of the judgment granting or denying the relief asked (Horn v. Horn, 73 Misc. Rep. 14, 18, 130 N. Y. Supp. 591), the defendant is under obligation to pay the sum due for alimony under the order awarding the same until a final judgment in his favor is entered.

[2] As the arrears for temporary alimony are superseded by the final judgment when entered (Wood v. Wood, 7 Lans. 204; 14 Cyc. 760; 3 Enc. L. & P. 138, 139; Thurston v. Thurston, 136 N. Y. Supp. 340), I will hold this matter open for 10 days in order to enablé the defendant to secure the entry of such judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GIEGERICH, J.

It appears from the papers submitted that the justice before whom this action for a separation was tried! announced orally at the conclusion of the trial that he had decided the issues in favor of the defendant. It is undisputed, however, that no formal decision or judgment has as yet been entered.

[1] As temporary alimony continues until the entry of the judgment granting or denying the relief asked (Horn v. Horn, 73 Misc. Rep. 14, 18, 130 N. Y. Supp. 591), the defendant is under obligation to pay the sum due for alimony under the order awarding the same until a final judgment in his favor is entered.

[2] As the arrears for temporary alimony are superseded by the final judgment when entered (Wood v. Wood, 7 Lans. 204; 14 Cyc. 760; 3 Enc. L. & P. 138, 139; Thurston v. Thurston, 136 N. Y. Supp. 340), I will hold this matter open for 10 days in order to enablé the defendant to secure the entry of such judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 N.Y.S. 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dietz-v-dietz-nysupct-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack