Dietz v. Dietz

1 A.D.2d 435, 766 N.Y.S.2d 901

This text of 1 A.D.2d 435 (Dietz v. Dietz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dietz v. Dietz, 1 A.D.2d 435, 766 N.Y.S.2d 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Spinner, J.), dated January 27, 2003, as, upon directing that he be incarcerated for contempt of court, set a purge amount of $1,370, and imposed an incarceration cost of $197 per day upon him.

Ordered that the order and judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof imposing an incarceration cost of $197 upon the father; as so modified, the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Upon proof that the father wilfully failed to obey the lawful [436]*436order of the Family Court to post an undertaking, the Family Court properly adjudged him in contempt, and included in the purge amount, in addition to arrears owed, the amount of the undertaking (see Family Ct Act §§ 471, 454). However, the imposition of an incarceration cost of $197 upon the father must be vacated (see Matter of Suffolk County Dept, of Social Sews. [Matthew] v Harry, 306 AD2d 490 [2003]; Matter of Moron v Moron, 306 AD2d 349 [2003]; Matter of DeMarco v Newton, 305 AD2d 501 [2003]). Santucci, J.E, Luciano, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeMarco v. Newton
305 A.D.2d 501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Moron v. Moron
306 A.D.2d 349 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Suffolk County Department of Social Services v. Harry
306 A.D.2d 490 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 A.D.2d 435, 766 N.Y.S.2d 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dietz-v-dietz-nyappdiv-2003.