Dietz v. Berger

196 S.E. 914, 57 Ga. App. 820, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 407
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 21, 1938
Docket26814
StatusPublished

This text of 196 S.E. 914 (Dietz v. Berger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dietz v. Berger, 196 S.E. 914, 57 Ga. App. 820, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 407 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Felton, J.

Where A sells B a stock of goods and agrees to buy it back in a certain time on the same basis as sold if B is not satisfied with the purchase, a suit by B for the purchase-price of the stock of goods, where A refused on demand to buy back and pay for the goods within the prescribed time, which did not allege that the goods had been stored for A by B is subject to general demurrer. Code, § 96-113; Dunson & Brothers Co. v. Smith Seed Co., 26 Ga. App. 585 (4) (106 S. E. 914). It was error for the court to overrule the general demurrer to the petition and further proceedings were nugatory.

Judgment reversed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., eonew.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunson & Bros. v. Smith Seed Co.
106 S.E. 914 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 S.E. 914, 57 Ga. App. 820, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dietz-v-berger-gactapp-1938.