Dietz v. Bank of Ringgold

183 S.E. 104, 52 Ga. App. 304, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 145
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 20, 1935·No. 25253·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Guerry, J.

Under the evidence, the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant’s plea that the notes sued on were without consideration was not sustained by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dietz v. Bank of Ringgold, 183 S.E. 104, 52 Ga. App. 304, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 145 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

183 S.E. 104 (Dietz v. Bank of Ringgold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnes v. Thornton
88 S.E.2d 189 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)