Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Dietz v. Bank of Ringgold

Dietz v. Bank of Ringgold

183 S.E. 104, 52 Ga. App. 304, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 145
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 20, 1935
Docket25253
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 183 S.E. 104 (Dietz v. Bank of Ringgold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dietz v. Bank of Ringgold, 183 S.E. 104, 52 Ga. App. 304, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 145 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Guerry, J.

Under the evidence, the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant’s plea that the notes sued on were without consideration was not sustained by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnes v. Thornton
88 S.E.2d 189 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 S.E. 104, 52 Ga. App. 304, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dietz-v-bank-of-ringgold-gactapp-1935.