Dietrich v. United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp.

59 F.2d 202, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 3342, 1932 A.M.C. 968
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJune 6, 1932
DocketNo. 436
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 F.2d 202 (Dietrich v. United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dietrich v. United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp., 59 F.2d 202, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 3342, 1932 A.M.C. 968 (2d Cir. 1932).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon tile theory that the Susquehanna Steamship Company was ojierating the ship Panola as agent for the appellee, the appellant seeks to recover on a judgment obtained in the state Supreme Court. The recovery is for a breach of a contract of carriage. The ship Panola was a merchant vessel owned by the United States. Under the authority of United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Lustgarten, 280 U. S. 320, 50 S. Ct. 118, 74 L. Ed. 451, and Weinstein v. Black Diamond S. S. Corp., 40 F.(2d) 590 (C. C. A. 2), the exclusive remedy as against the United States is under the Suits in Admiralty Act (46 USCA §§ 741-752). The rule announced in these cases is applicable to the instant suit, and upon such authority the bill was properly dismissed.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dietrich v. United States
80 F.2d 207 (Second Circuit, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 F.2d 202, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 3342, 1932 A.M.C. 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dietrich-v-united-states-shipping-board-merchant-fleet-corp-ca2-1932.