Dietrich v. Town of West Hoboken

82 A. 899, 82 N.J.L. 732, 53 Vroom 732, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 291
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 4, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 82 A. 899 (Dietrich v. Town of West Hoboken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dietrich v. Town of West Hoboken, 82 A. 899, 82 N.J.L. 732, 53 Vroom 732, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 291 (N.J. 1912).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in Dubelbeiss v. The Town of West Hoboken, decided at this term, the judgment under review in this case will be affirmed.

[733]*733For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Congdon, White, JJ. 13.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 A. 899, 82 N.J.L. 732, 53 Vroom 732, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dietrich-v-town-of-west-hoboken-nj-1912.