Dietrich v. Stier
This text of 13 A.D.2d 778 (Dietrich v. Stier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action against a dentist to recover damages for personal injuries sustained [779]*779by reason of defendant’s alleged malpractice, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 6, 1960, as on reconsideration adhered to the original decision and denied plaintiff’s application for a preference pursuant to rule 9 of the Queens County Supreme Court Rules. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. On this record, it may not he held that the Trial Term improvidently exercised its discretion on the motion for reconsideration. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 A.D.2d 778, 215 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dietrich-v-stier-nyappdiv-1961.