Dieter-Wenzel Const. Co. v. Eppler
This text of 218 F. 987 (Dieter-Wenzel Const. Co. v. Eppler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
None of the assignments of error on this writ are well •taken. See City of Key West v. Baer, 66 Fed. 443, 13 C. C. A. 572; Adams v. New York Life Ins. Co., 113 Fed. 303, 51 C. C. A. 263; Martinton v. Fairbanks, 112 U. S. 670, 5 Sup. Ct. 321, 28 L. Ed. 862; Lehnen v. Dickson, 148 [988]*988U. S. 71, 13 Sup. Ct. 481, 37 L. Ed. 373; Dooley v. Pease, 180 U. S. 126-131, 21 Sup. Ct. 329, 45 L. Ed. 457; Wilson v. Merchants’ Loan & Trust Co., 183 U. S. 121, 127 et seq., 22 Sup. Ct. 55, 46 L. Ed. 113; and also Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. Curzi, 211 Fed. 580-587, 128 C. C. A. 180, and cases there cited. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
218 F. 987, 133 C.C.A. 670, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dieter-wenzel-const-co-v-eppler-ca5-1914.