Dieter-Wenzel Const. Co. v. Eppler
Opinion
None of the assignments of error on this writ are well •taken. See City of Key West v. Baer, 66 Fed. 443, 13 C. C. A. 572; Adams v. New York Life Ins. Co., 113 Fed. 303, 51 C. C. A. 263; Martinton v. Fairbanks, 112 U. S. 670, 5 Sup. Ct. 321, 28 L. Ed. 862; Lehnen v. Dickson, 148 [988]*988U. S. 71, 13 Sup. Ct. 481, 37 L. Ed. 373; Dooley v. Pease, 180 U. S. 126-131, 21 Sup. Ct. 329, 45 L. Ed. 457; Wilson v. Merchants’ Loan & Trust Co., 183 U. S. 121, 127 et seq., 22 Sup. Ct. 55, 46 L. Ed. 113; and also Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. Curzi, 211 Fed. 580-587, 128 C. C. A. 180, and cases there cited. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
218 F. 987 (Dieter-Wenzel Const. Co. v. Eppler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.