Diesel Tanker A. C. Dodge, Inc. v. J. M. Carras, Inc.

218 F.2d 911
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 3, 1955
DocketNo. 124, Docket 23219
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 218 F.2d 911 (Diesel Tanker A. C. Dodge, Inc. v. J. M. Carras, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diesel Tanker A. C. Dodge, Inc. v. J. M. Carras, Inc., 218 F.2d 911 (2d Cir. 1955).

Opinion

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. The order of April 19, 1954, is appealable, under 28 U.S.C. § 1292, as an order involving the modification of an injunction order. We think that what subsequently occurred did not render the April 19 order moot since appellant, in obtaining the stay in the Maryland suit, acted under the compulsion of the April 19 order so that it might have the benefit of the usual injunction incident to a limitation proceeding.

2. The April 19 order was clearly correct. See The Salvore, 2 Cir., 36 F.2d 712, 713, where we said: “The limitation proceeding was an appeal to a court of admiralty, which is a court of equity, * * * and the appellee, seeking equity, should willingly do equity, if it wants the benefit of avoiding a multiplicity of suits and limiting its liability, for it in effect asks for a complete and just disposition of the ‘many-cornered controversy’ * * * It must be willing to bring in all the controversies in the limitation proceedings, for it has invoked the court’s aid.”

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 F.2d 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diesel-tanker-a-c-dodge-inc-v-j-m-carras-inc-ca2-1955.