Dies v. Hurtel
34 Ga. 109
This text of 34 Ga. 109 (Dies v. Hurtel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dies v. Hurtel, 34 Ga. 109 (Ga. 1864).
Opinion
The plaintiff in error, being a minor under the age of 17 years, at which he would have been subject to military duty, was, on that account, entitled to his discharge. He could not make a consent or contract for service that was binding on him, and the military authorities had no other claim upon him. Sec Moncrief vs. Hurtel, decided at Macon, January Term 1803.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 Ga. 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dies-v-hurtel-ga-1864.