Dierking v. United States

Court of Claims

Dierking v. United States

92 Ct. Cl. 141, 1940 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 9, 1940 WL 4006

United States Court of Claims·Decided November 12, 1940·No. No. 45032·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[144] The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover, in an opinion per ewriam, as follows:

.The plaintiff is clearly entitled to recover, as we have heretofore held in several different cases. Franz J. Jonitz v. The United States, 89 C. Cls. 155; Lyle M. Shields v. The United States, 90 C. Cls. 675; Charles D. McColl v. The United States, 90 C. Cls. 676; and Orville Jackson v. The United States, 90 C. Cls. 526.

On authority of those cases judgment will be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $240.00. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[144] The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover, in an opinion per ewriam, as follows:

.The plaintiff is clearly entitled to recover, as we have heretofore held in several different cases. Franz J. Jonitz v. The United States, 89 C. Cls. 155; Lyle M. Shields v. The United States, 90 C. Cls. 675; Charles D. McColl v. The United States, 90 C. Cls. 676; and Orville Jackson v. The United States, 90 C. Cls. 526.

On authority of those cases judgment will be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $240.00. It is so ordered.

Dierking v. United States, 92 Ct. Cl. 141, 1940 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 9, 1940 WL 4006 (cc 1940).

Pincite

92 Ct. Cl. 141 (Dierking v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related