Dierking v. United States
This text of 92 Ct. Cl. 141 (Dierking v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[144]*144The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover, in an opinion per ewriam, as follows:
.The plaintiff is clearly entitled to recover, as we have heretofore held in several different cases. Franz J. Jonitz v. The United States, 89 C. Cls. 155; Lyle M. Shields v. The United States, 90 C. Cls. 675; Charles D. McColl v. The United States, 90 C. Cls. 676; and Orville Jackson v. The United States, 90 C. Cls. 526.
On authority of those cases judgment will be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $240.00. It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 Ct. Cl. 141, 1940 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 9, 1940 WL 4006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dierking-v-united-states-cc-1940.