Home/Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama/Diercks v. Odom

Diercks v. Odom

254 So. 3d 230
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Diercks v. Odom. Read the opinion of the Court — 254 So. 3d 215 →
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided October 20, 2017·No. 2151011·Published

Opinion

MOORE, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court, reversing a summary judgment entered by the Escambia Circuit Court, see Diercks v. Odom, 254 So.3d 215 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017), has been reversed, and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte Odom, 254 So.3d 222 (Ala. 2017). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court's opinion, the summary judgment entered by the Escambia Circuit Court is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Thompson, P.J., and Pittman, Thomas, and Donaldson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diercks v. Odom, 254 So. 3d 230 (Ala. Ct. App. 2017).

254 So. 3d 230 (Diercks v. Odom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Diercks v. Odom
254 So. 3d 215 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2017)
Diercks v. Odom (Ex parte Odom)
254 So. 3d 222 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2017)