Diepenbrock v. Shaw
21 Mo. 122
Opinion
It is the settled law, that exceptions must be taken at the time, and the bill prepared and signed during the term, and not afterwards, unless it is so consented to.
Here, the only exception taken, that has been properly preserved, so that it can be noticed by this court, is, the refusal of the lower court to set aside the final judgment rendered at a preceding term, and we see no error here. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Diepenbrock v. Shaw, 21 Mo. 122 (Mo. 1855).
21 Mo. 122 (Diepenbrock v. Shaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Danforth v. Lindell Railway Co.
27 S.W. 715 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
Mentzing v. Pacific R. R.
64 Mo. 25 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1876)