Diepenbrock v. Shaw

21 Mo. 122
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided March 15, 1855·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Leonard, Judge.

It is the settled law, that exceptions must be taken at the time, and the bill prepared and signed during the term, and not afterwards, unless it is so consented to.

Here, the only exception taken, that has been properly preserved, so that it can be noticed by this court, is, the refusal of the lower court to set aside the final judgment rendered at a preceding term, and we see no error here. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diepenbrock v. Shaw, 21 Mo. 122 (Mo. 1855).

21 Mo. 122 (Diepenbrock v. Shaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Danforth v. Lindell Railway Co.
27 S.W. 715 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
Mentzing v. Pacific R. R.
64 Mo. 25 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1876)