Dienstag v. Dienstag
This text of 581 So. 2d 257 (Dienstag v. Dienstag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Treating the papers presented as a timely notice of appeal from the final judgment of dissolution entered below on May 23, 1991, the final judgment is hereby vacated as improperly and unauthorizedly entered during the pendency in this court of a non-final appeal herein. Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(f); Cadwell v. Cadwell, 549 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Sammons v. Sammons, 479 So.2d 223 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Carter v. Dorman, 385 So.2d 740 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The cause is remanded with directions to vacate the judgment, but without prejudice to further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. See Cadwell, 549 So.2d at 1135.
Vacated, remanded with directions.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
581 So. 2d 257, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6679, 1991 WL 116851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dienstag-v-dienstag-fladistctapp-1991.