Home/Supreme Court/Diener v. Lane

Diener v. Lane

239 U.S. 632, 36 S. Ct. 219, 60 L. Ed. 477, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1422
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 6, 1915
DocketNo. 689
StatusPublished

This text of 239 U.S. 632 (Diener v. Lane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diener v. Lane, 239 U.S. 632, 36 S. Ct. 219, 60 L. Ed. 477, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1422 (1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdic-

tion upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380; (2) Lancaster v. Thacker, 239 17. S., ante, p. 625; Wallbrecht v. Ingram, 239 U. S., ante, p. 625; (3) Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2), 212 U. S. 112, 118; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2)
212 U.S. 112 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.
226 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Manhattan Life Ins. Co. of NY v. Cohen
234 U.S. 123 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Overton v. Oklahoma
235 U.S. 31 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce
235 U.S. 380 (Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 U.S. 632, 36 S. Ct. 219, 60 L. Ed. 477, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diener-v-lane-scotus-1915.