Diemel v. Scheveland

New York Court of Common Pleas

Diemel v. Scheveland

9 N.Y.S. 955, 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 860, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 540

New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided April 7, 1890·Published

Opinion

Larremore, C. J.

After a careful re-examination of the case, I have reached the conclusion that this application should be denied. It does not appear from the affidavit that any statute or decision has been overlooked in the conclusion reached. Neither does it appear that the questions presented by the learned counsel for the motion have been frequently passed upon, as shown by the authorities already cited. The motion is therefore denied, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Larremore, C. J.

After a careful re-examination of the case, I have reached the conclusion that this application should be denied. It does not appear from the affidavit that any statute or decision has been overlooked in the conclusion reached. Neither does it appear that the questions presented by the learned counsel for the motion have been frequently passed upon, as shown by the authorities already cited. The motion is therefore denied, without costs.

Diemel v. Scheveland, 9 N.Y.S. 955, 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 860, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 540 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Pincite

9 N.Y.S. 955 (Diemel v. Scheveland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.