Diemel v. Scheveland

New York Court of Common Pleas

Diemel v. Scheveland

9 N.Y.S. 955, 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 860, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 540

DecidedApril 7, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 9 N.Y.S. 955 (Diemel v. Scheveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diemel v. Scheveland, 9 N.Y.S. 955, 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 860, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 540 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Larremore, C. J.

After a careful re-examination of the case, I have reached the conclusion that this application should be denied. It does not appear from the affidavit that any statute or decision has been overlooked in the conclusion reached. Neither does it appear that the questions presented by the learned counsel for the motion have been frequently passed upon, as shown by the authorities already cited. The motion is therefore denied, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Larremore, C. J.

After a careful re-examination of the case, I have reached the conclusion that this application should be denied. It does not appear from the affidavit that any statute or decision has been overlooked in the conclusion reached. Neither does it appear that the questions presented by the learned counsel for the motion have been frequently passed upon, as shown by the authorities already cited. The motion is therefore denied, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 N.Y.S. 955, 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 860, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diemel-v-scheveland-nyctcompl-1890.