DiEleuterio v. Cannon

Opinion

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JOHN DIELEUTERIO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) C.A. No. N23C-01-057 VLM MICHAEL CANNON and CANNON ) NEVADA d/b/a MAIN LIGHT, LLC, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Reconsider (“the Motion”) and

the responses hereto,1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. Defendants do not

identify any controlling precedent or legal principle that this Court overlooked, nor

do they demonstrate the Court misapprehended the law or facts in a way that would

affect the outcome of its decision.2

1 D.I. 70, 72. 2 Cummings v. Jimmy’s Grille, Inc., 2000 WL 1211167, at *2 (Del. Super. Aug. 9, 2000).

1 The Court has reviewed the Proposed Response to the Second Motion to

Compel attached to this Motion.3 Considering the Response on its merit, the Motion

to Compel remains granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Calvin Scott Judge Calvin L. Scott, Jr.

3 See D.I. 70, Ex. A.