Diehl v. The Cutler Group (Pet of: Worrell h/w)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 24, 2017·No. 565 MAL 2016·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

GLENN AND WENDY DIEHL, H/W AND : No. 565 MAL 2016 DANIEL AND SUSAN SCOTT, H/W AND : GAYATHRI AND SRIRAM KRISHNAN, : H/W AND RASHMI RADHAKRISHNAN : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from AND LISA PARVISKHAN AND JOSEPH : the Order of the Superior Court AND ANN WORRELL, H/W :

: :

v. :

: :

THE CUTLER GROUP, INC. :

: :

PETITION OF: JOSEPH AND ANN : WORRELL, H/W :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of January, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diehl v. The Cutler Group (Pet of: Worrell h/w), (Pa. 2017).

Diehl v. The Cutler Group (Pet of: Worrell h/w) (Diehl v. The Cutler Group (Pet of: Worrell h/w)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.