Diehl v. RL COOLSAET CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
713 N.W.2d 768, 475 Mich. 857
This text of 713 N.W.2d 768 (Diehl v. RL COOLSAET CONSTRUCTION COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Diehl v. RL COOLSAET CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 713 N.W.2d 768, 475 Mich. 857 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
L.E. DIEHL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
R.L. COOLSAET CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Liberty Mutual Group, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*769 Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
713 N.W.2d 768, 475 Mich. 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diehl-v-rl-coolsaet-construction-company-mich-2006.