Home/Supreme Court/Diehl v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Diehl v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

348 U.S. 960, 75 S. Ct. 521, 99 L. Ed. 749, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1488, 35 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2612
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 14, 1955
DocketNo. 246
StatusPublished
Cited by59 cases

This text of 348 U.S. 960 (Diehl v. Lehigh Valley Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diehl v. Lehigh Valley Railroad, 348 U.S. 960, 75 S. Ct. 521, 99 L. Ed. 749, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1488, 35 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2612 (1955).

Opinion

[960]*960Certiorari, 348 U. S. 860, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Per Curiam:

Upon the facts disclosed in the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 211 F. 2d 95, the applicable Acts of Congress, and the opinion of this Court in Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 338 U. S. 278, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. Mr. Justice Reed dissents for the reasons given in the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger and Samuel D. Slade filed a memorandum for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fountain v. John E. Graham & Sons
833 F. Supp. 873 (S.D. Alabama, 1993)
Cruz v. Chesapeake Shipping Inc.
738 F. Supp. 809 (D. Delaware, 1990)
Koller v. Richardson-Merrell Inc.
737 F.2d 1038 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
Koller ex rel. Koller v. Richardson-Merrell Inc.
737 F.2d 1038 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
State v. Buck
314 S.E.2d 406 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1984)
Goggin v. Lincoln St. Louis
540 F. Supp. 46 (E.D. Missouri, 1982)
State v. Martinez
641 P.2d 1087 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1982)
United States v. James Ralph Long
656 F.2d 1162 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
Bradley v. Milliken
495 F. Supp. 217 (E.D. Michigan, 1980)
People v. Jones
95 Cal. App. 3d 403 (California Court of Appeal, 1979)
United States v. Security National Bank
546 F.2d 492 (Second Circuit, 1976)
Nichols v. Kansas City Power & Light Company
391 F. Supp. 833 (W.D. Missouri, 1975)
Randall v. Giant Food Markets, Inc.
390 F. Supp. 1064 (E.D. Tennessee, 1974)
Litwicki v. PPG Industries, Inc.
386 F. Supp. 296 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1974)
Davis v. Alabama Power Company
383 F. Supp. 880 (N.D. Alabama, 1974)
Carmine Palmarozzo v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc.
490 F.2d 586 (Second Circuit, 1973)
Smith v. American Mail Line, Ltd.
361 F. Supp. 1110 (W.D. Washington, 1973)
Gruca v. United States Steel Corporation
360 F. Supp. 38 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)
Speyerer v. City of New Orleans Civil Service Commission
254 So. 2d 635 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1971)
Roy Paul Pomrening v. United Air Lines, Inc.
448 F.2d 609 (Seventh Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
348 U.S. 960, 75 S. Ct. 521, 99 L. Ed. 749, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1488, 35 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diehl-v-lehigh-valley-railroad-scotus-1955.