Diehl v. Diehl

385 A.2d 132, 120 R.I. 971, 1978 R.I. LEXIS 859
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided April 12, 1978·No. M. P. No. 75-202·Published

Opinion

The above-entitled matter came on to be heard on February 6, 1978, to show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution for failure to comply with Rule 16 of the Rhode Island Supreme Court.

Kirshenbaum It Kirshenbaum, Alfred Factor, for petitioner. A. Norman LaSalle, for respondent.

No cause having been shown, the petition for certiorari is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diehl v. Diehl, 385 A.2d 132, 120 R.I. 971, 1978 R.I. LEXIS 859 (R.I. 1978).

385 A.2d 132 (Diehl v. Diehl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.