Diehl v. Beck
61 A.D. 570, 70 N.Y.S. 818
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 61 A.D. 570 (Diehl v. Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Diehl v. Beck, 61 A.D. 570, 70 N.Y.S. 818 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).
Opinion
The defendant neglected to serve with his motion papers the proposed pleading'; and this,' among others, may have been the reason for the denial of the motion. 'Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. ' '
Present—’Patteeson, O’Bbien, Ingbaham, McLaughlin and Hatch, JJ.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and. disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jones v. Gould
56 Misc. 328 (New York Supreme Court, 1907)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
61 A.D. 570, 70 N.Y.S. 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diehl-v-beck-nyappdiv-1901.