Diehl Machines, Inc. v. Midland National Insurance Co.
This text of 238 So. 2d 137 (Diehl Machines, Inc. v. Midland National Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff moved for a new trial on the question of damages. The trial court granted the motion and went on to amend a portion of a pre-trial order concerning the burden of proof. Plaintiff seeks to appeal. It is our view that plaintiff is not “aggrieved” and so cannot challenge the order appealed. We do not pass upon the propriety of the trial court’s pre-trial decision as concerns the burden of proof. A consideration of it would be premature and the parties may seek review of the final judgment as they are advised.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 So. 2d 137, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diehl-machines-inc-v-midland-national-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1970.