Diehl ex rel. Terry v. Northwest Trustee Services Inc.

Ninth Circuit

Diehl ex rel. Terry v. Northwest Trustee Services Inc.

420 F. App'x 716

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 10, 2011·No. No. 10-35518·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

*

The key question in this appeal is whether an indenture trustee may appropriately delegate to a third party the duty to call the sale under the Montana Small Tract Financing Act (“STFA”). The Montana Code allows principals to delegate tasks to agents “unless a contrary intention clearly appears.” Mont.Code Ann. § 28-10-105. No such intention is expressed in the STFA, a view confirmed by the Montana Supreme Court. See Knucklehead Land Co., Inc. v. Accutitle, Inc., 340 Mont. 62, 172 P.3d 116, 120-21 (2007) (holding that an indenture trustee has only the duties specifically set forth in the [717]*717STFA); see also S.D. Myers, Inc. v. City and Cnty. of San Francisco, 258 F.3d 461, 473 (9th Cir.2001) (“When interpreting state law, we are bound by decisions of the state’s highest court.”). We therefore affirm the district court’s determination that the indenture trustee may delegate its duty to call the sale under the STFA.

The plaintiffs’ remaining arguments as to the alleged need for agents to qualify as indenture trustees under the STFA are unpersuasive. See Mont. Code Ann. §§ 71-1-306; 28-10-105. Because Montana law is clear on the legal questions in this appeal, we deny the motion to certify the question to the state supreme court. See Mont. RApp. P. 15(3). The plaintiffs concede that their Fair Debt Collection Practices Act claim fails if there was no violation of Montana law.

We AFFIRM the decision of the district court and DENY the Motion to Certify.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM

*

The key question in this appeal is whether an indenture trustee may appropriately delegate to a third party the duty to call the sale under the Montana Small Tract Financing Act (“STFA”). The Montana Code allows principals to delegate tasks to agents “unless a contrary intention clearly appears.” Mont.Code Ann. § 28-10-105. No such intention is expressed in the STFA, a view confirmed by the Montana Supreme Court. See Knucklehead Land Co., Inc. v. Accutitle, Inc., 340 Mont. 62, 172 P.3d 116, 120-21 (2007) (holding that an indenture trustee has only the duties specifically set forth in the [717]*717STFA); see also S.D. Myers, Inc. v. City and Cnty. of San Francisco, 258 F.3d 461, 473 (9th Cir.2001) (“When interpreting state law, we are bound by decisions of the state’s highest court.”). We therefore affirm the district court’s determination that the indenture trustee may delegate its duty to call the sale under the STFA.

The plaintiffs’ remaining arguments as to the alleged need for agents to qualify as indenture trustees under the STFA are unpersuasive. See Mont. Code Ann. §§ 71-1-306; 28-10-105. Because Montana law is clear on the legal questions in this appeal, we deny the motion to certify the question to the state supreme court. See Mont. RApp. P. 15(3). The plaintiffs concede that their Fair Debt Collection Practices Act claim fails if there was no violation of Montana law.

We AFFIRM the decision of the district court and DENY the Motion to Certify.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Diehl ex rel. Terry v. Northwest Trustee Services Inc., 420 F. App'x 716 (9th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

420 F. App'x 716 (Diehl ex rel. Terry v. Northwest Trustee Services Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related