Diego Pascual Francisco v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 3, 2015
Docket4D14-4039
StatusPublished

This text of Diego Pascual Francisco v. State of Florida (Diego Pascual Francisco v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diego Pascual Francisco v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

DIEGO PASCUAL FRANCISCO, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D14-4039

[June 3, 2015]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Stephen A. Rapp, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502012CF007694AXXXMB.

Diego Pascual Francisco, Crawfordville, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Iacono v. State, 930 So. 2d 829, 831 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

CIKLIN, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Iacono v. State
930 So. 2d 829 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Diego Pascual Francisco v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diego-pascual-francisco-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2015.