Dieffenbach v. Greenleaf Compassionate Care Center, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island
DecidedOctober 31, 2022
Docket1:20-cv-00413
StatusUnknown

This text of Dieffenbach v. Greenleaf Compassionate Care Center, Inc. (Dieffenbach v. Greenleaf Compassionate Care Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dieffenbach v. Greenleaf Compassionate Care Center, Inc., (D.R.I. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

____________________________________ ) JEFFERY DIEFFENBACH, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:20-cv-00413-MSM-PAS ) GREENLEAF COMPASSIONATE ) CARE CENTER, INC., ) Defendant ) ____________________________________)

O R D E R Before the Court after a hearing and subsequent conference is Mr. Dieffenbach’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 33), which seeks production of seven documents in the possession of the defendant. The Court issued an Order to the defendant to submit, “for its in-camera review unredacted copies of the documents produced as GL012777, GL014024, GL015135, GL014062, GL014048, GL015093, and GL015093.” (ECF No. 45.) The defendant maintains the documents are protected by attorney-client privilege, by the work product privilege, or by both. The attorney-client privilege protects “communications made in confidence by a client and a client’s employees to an attorney, acting as an attorney, for the purpose of obtaining legal advice.” 649 F.3d 5, 30 (1st Cir. 2011). The work-product privilege “protects work done by an attorney in anticipation of, or during, litigation from disclosure to the opposing party.” 274 F.3d 563, 574 (1st Cir. 2001).

After review and consideration of the relevant standards, the Court Orders the following: 1. GL012777 and GL014024 may be withheld as privileged; 2. The defendant is directed to produce to plaintiff, within seven (7) days, the remaining documents: GL015135, GL014062, GL014048, GL015093, and GL015093. To the extent these five emails forward or include content from GL012777 and GL014024, those portions may be withheld.

IT IS SO ORDERED: ____________________________ Mary S. McElroy United States District Judge

Date: October 31, 2002

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena
274 F.3d 563 (First Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dieffenbach v. Greenleaf Compassionate Care Center, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dieffenbach-v-greenleaf-compassionate-care-center-inc-rid-2022.