Diefendorff v. Heath

New York Court of Chancery

Diefendorff v. Heath

6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 32, 1846 N.Y. LEXIS 229

DecidedAugust 4, 1846

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 32 (Diefendorff v. Heath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diefendorff v. Heath, 6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 32, 1846 N.Y. LEXIS 229 (N.Y. 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

This was an application for an order of publication as to a non-resident defendant. The order, as drawn by the solicitor, directed that notice should be published in the state paper, and in “ some newspaper published in the county of t ii mi •. n . i i . * 1 , , , J. The chancellor said this was erroneous; that the order should, in all cases, specify the name of the newspaper in which the notice is to he published.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This was an application for an order of publication as to a non-resident defendant. The order, as drawn by the solicitor, directed that notice should be published in the state paper, and in “ some newspaper published in the county of t ii mi •. n . i i . * 1 , , , J. The chancellor said this was erroneous; that the order should, in all cases, specify the name of the newspaper in which the notice is to he published.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 32, 1846 N.Y. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diefendorff-v-heath-nychanct-1846.