Diedrich v. City of Newport News

Fourth Circuit

Diedrich v. City of Newport News

126 F. App'x 112

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Diedrich v. City of Newport News. Read the opinion of the Court — 109 F. App'x 526 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 15, 2005·No. 04-2399·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jason L. Diedrich appeals the district court’s order denying his attorney’s motion to withdraw as counsel and awarding attorney fees to the City of Newport News. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Diedrich v. City of Newport News, No. CA-04-9 (E.D.Va. filed Nov. 29, 2004; entered Nov. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jason L. Diedrich appeals the district court’s order denying his attorney’s motion to withdraw as counsel and awarding attorney fees to the City of Newport News. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Diedrich v. City of Newport News, No. CA-04-9 (E.D.Va. filed Nov. 29, 2004; entered Nov. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Diedrich v. City of Newport News, 126 F. App'x 112 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

126 F. App'x 112 (Diedrich v. City of Newport News) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.