Diedel v. New York El. Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Diedel v. New York El. Railroad

44 N.Y.S. 1115

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 44 N.Y.S. 1115 (Diedel v. New York El. Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diedel v. New York El. Railroad, 44 N.Y.S. 1115 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We think that the fee damage allowed is supported by the evidence. The rental damage, however, is too high. That of No. 375 Third avenue should be reduced to $72 a year, and of No. 513 Third avenue to $120 a year. The extra allowance contained in the judgment must be correspondingly reduced. The judgment should be modified accordingly, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs to either party,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We think that the fee damage allowed is supported by the evidence. The rental damage, however, is too high. That of No. 375 Third avenue should be reduced to $72 a year, and of No. 513 Third avenue to $120 a year. The extra allowance contained in the judgment must be correspondingly reduced. The judgment should be modified accordingly, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs to either party,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 N.Y.S. 1115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diedel-v-new-york-el-railroad-nyappdiv-1897.