Diebold v. TREASURER OF STATE OF MISSOURI-CUSTODIAN OF SECOND INJURY FUND

174 S.W.3d 712, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1584, 2005 WL 2847973
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 1, 2005·No. WD 64870·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Louis Diebold (“Employee”) appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“Commission”) decision that his most recent work-related injury, combined with his prior disability, resulted only in permanent partial disability, not permanent total disability. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diebold v. TREASURER OF STATE OF MISSOURI-CUSTODIAN OF SECOND INJURY FUND, 174 S.W.3d 712, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1584, 2005 WL 2847973 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

174 S.W.3d 712 (Diebold v. TREASURER OF STATE OF MISSOURI-CUSTODIAN OF SECOND INJURY FUND) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Huber Ex Rel. Boothe v. Huber
174 S.W.3d 712 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)