Diebold, Inc. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 894, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1844
United States Customs Court·Decided May 29, 1967·No. No. P67/177; protest 61/19403 (New York); No. P67/178; protests 64/7143,etc. (New York); No. P67/179; protest 66/12058 (New York)·Published
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of certain padlocks similar in all material respects to those the subject of Shriro Trading Corp. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Diebold, Inc. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 894, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1844 (cusc 1967).
58 Cust. Ct. 894 (Diebold, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shriro Trading Corp. v. United States
56 Cust. Ct. 422 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)