Diebal v. Diebal

Missouri Court of Appeals

Diebal v. Diebal

525 S.W.3d 221, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 873, 2017 WL 3860309

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 5, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104527

StatusPublished

This text of 525 S.W.3d 221 (Diebal v. Diebal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diebal v. Diebal, 525 S.W.3d 221, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 873, 2017 WL 3860309 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Lisa E. Diebal (“Wife”) appeals from the trial court’s amended judgment of dissolution, inter alia dissolving the marriage between Wife and Kenneth A. Diebal (“HusSband”) and awarding to each various marital property and debt, including an award of attorney’s fees.

[222]*222We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Lisa E. Diebal (“Wife”) appeals from the trial court’s amended judgment of dissolution, inter alia dissolving the marriage between Wife and Kenneth A. Diebal (“HusSband”) and awarding to each various marital property and debt, including an award of attorney’s fees.

[222]*222We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

525 S.W.3d 221, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 873, 2017 WL 3860309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diebal-v-diebal-moctapp-2017.