Didonato v. Youth Investments of Davie Inc.

870 So. 2d 206, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6271, 2004 WL 950179
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 5, 2004·No. No. 4D03-1394·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant’s motion for certification and, as we did in Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corp. v. Lasky, 868 So.2d 547, 548 n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)(on rehearing), certify conflict:

One could argue there is no conflict with Goble v. Frohman, 848 So.2d 406 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), review granted, 865 So.2d 480 (Fla. Jan. 22, 2004), which involved HMO benefits rather than Medicare. To the extent that HMO benefits and Medicare benefits are interchangeable for this subject, however, we certify conflict.

WARNER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Didonato v. Youth Investments of Davie Inc., 870 So. 2d 206, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6271, 2004 WL 950179 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

870 So. 2d 206 (Didonato v. Youth Investments of Davie Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corp. v. Lasky
868 So. 2d 547 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Goble v. Frohman
848 So. 2d 406 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)