Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/DiDomenico v. Town of Hempstead

DiDomenico v. Town of Hempstead

225 A.D.2d 514, 639 N.Y.2d 719, 639 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1929
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 4, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 225 A.D.2d 514 (DiDomenico v. Town of Hempstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DiDomenico v. Town of Hempstead, 225 A.D.2d 514, 639 N.Y.2d 719, 639 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1929 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

[515]*515We agree with the Supreme Court that the appellant failed to establish a prima facie case of serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Thus, summary judgment was properly awarded to the defendants (see, Insurance Law § 5104 [a]; Licari v Elliott, 57 NY2d 230). Thompson, J. P., Friedmann, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Licari v. Elliott
441 N.E.2d 1088 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 514, 639 N.Y.2d 719, 639 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/didomenico-v-town-of-hempstead-nyappdiv-1996.