Didlake v. Hooper

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Didlake v. Hooper

21 Va. 194

DecidedOctober 31, 1820

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Va. 194 (Didlake v. Hooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Didlake v. Hooper, 21 Va. 194 (Va. Ct. App. 1820).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The court is of opinion that the limitation in the will of Unity Hooper is good; and that the decree of dissolution is therefore erroneous. The decree is reversed with costs; and the cause remanded for farther proceedings, according to the principles here stated.

See Higgenbotham v. Rucker, 2 Call, 316. Royall v. Eppes, 2 Munf. 491. Dunn v. Bray, 1 Call, 344 Timberlake v. Graves, 6 Munf. 174. Gresham Gresbam. 6 Munf 187.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The court is of opinion that the limitation in the will of Unity Hooper is good; and that the decree of dissolution is therefore erroneous. The decree is reversed with costs; and the cause remanded for farther proceedings, according to the principles here stated.

See Higgenbotham v. Rucker, 2 Call, 316. Royall v. Eppes, 2 Munf. 491. Dunn v. Bray, 1 Call, 344 Timberlake v. Graves, 6 Munf. 174. Gresham Gresbam. 6 Munf 187.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Va. 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/didlake-v-hooper-vactapp-1820.