Didlake v. Hooper

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Didlake v. Hooper

21 Va. 194

Court of Appeals of Virginia·Decided October 31, 1820·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

The court is of opinion that the limitation in the will of Unity Hooper is good; and that the decree of dissolution is therefore erroneous. The decree is reversed with costs; and the cause remanded for farther proceedings, according to the principles here stated.

See Higgenbotham v. Rucker, 2 Call, 316. Royall v. Eppes, 2 Munf. 491. Dunn v. Bray, 1 Call, 344 Timberlake v. Graves, 6 Munf. 174. Gresham Gresbam. 6 Munf 187.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The court is of opinion that the limitation in the will of Unity Hooper is good; and that the decree of dissolution is therefore erroneous. The decree is reversed with costs; and the cause remanded for farther proceedings, according to the principles here stated.

See Higgenbotham v. Rucker, 2 Call, 316. Royall v. Eppes, 2 Munf. 491. Dunn v. Bray, 1 Call, 344 Timberlake v. Graves, 6 Munf. 174. Gresham Gresbam. 6 Munf 187.

Didlake v. Hooper, 21 Va. 194 (Va. Ct. App. 1820).

Pincite

21 Va. 194 (Didlake v. Hooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.