Didio v. Hobeika
91 A.D.2d 1183, 459 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16535
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 21, 1983
StatusPublished
This text of 91 A.D.2d 1183 (Didio v. Hobeika) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Didio v. Hobeika, 91 A.D.2d 1183, 459 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16535 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).
Opinion
— Judgment affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated at Trial Term, Ringrose, J. All concur, Simons, J., not participating. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Ringrose, J. — restrictive covenants.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Simons, Callahan, Boomer and Moule, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
91 A.D.2d 1183, 459 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/didio-v-hobeika-nyappdiv-1983.