Didier v. Johns
This text of 1997 Ohio 150 (Didier v. Johns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 1214.]
DIDIER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. JOHNS, APPELLEE. [Cite as Didier v. Johns, 1997-Ohio-150.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 96-1509—Submitted June 10, 1997—Decided July 30, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. CA 15602. ___________________ Thomas J. Manning Co., L.P.A., and Thomas J. Manning; Dwight D. Brannon & Associates and Dwight D. Brannon, for appellants. Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder Co., L.P.A., John T. McLandrich and Robert H. Stoffers, for appellee. ___________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. ___________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1997 Ohio 150, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/didier-v-johns-ohio-1997.